Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/47359
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorSlozhenikina, Yulia V.-
dc.contributor.authorKozlovskaya, Natalia V.-
dc.contributor.authorMusaeva, Anastasia S.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-27T19:31:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-27T19:31:56Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-
dc.identifier.citationSlozhenikina, Y. V., Kozlovskaya, N. V., & Musaeva, A. S. (2024). Scientific Discourse with the Key Term Artificial Intelligence. The World of Russian Word, (3), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu30.2023.311en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu30.2023.311-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/47359-
dc.description.abstractThe authors argue that at present, a new scientific object, a discourse with the key term artificial intelligence (AI), has formed in the language of science. The state of the discourse is characterized as extremely debatable. From a substantive point of view, the articles have the object of AI technology, and the subject is the problems of the emergence of AI systems in various branches of human activity. The formation of AI discourse is at the initial stage, as evidenced by the elements of linguocreativity in the texts of institutional discourse, characterized by the lack of imagery, personalities and terminology. The authors emphasize the novelty of this phenomenon and the comprehensiveness of AI technologies with different words and word combinations with temporal and spatial semantics. In the discourse lexical means create the effect of speed, pressure, quantitative and qualitative growth of new AI systems. The key words of the new discourse are advantage, benefit, trust, challenges. The discourse is characterized by metaphorical language and a large number of personifications. From axiological positions the value of AI is not questioned. From the point of view of determining the author’s goal-setting, the purpose of the text in the discourse, new goals are affirmed, namely the justification of the opportunities and limits of the application of AI. The communicative strategy of the authors of the articles is aimed at creating the effect of readers’ involvement, synergy in achieving the goals. For this purpose, a variety of rhetorical means and techniques are used (personal pronouns, personal forms of verbs, rhetorical questions, oxymoron, phraseological expressions, winged words, epithets, etc.). At this stage of the existence of scientific discourse with the key word artificial intelligence is found similar to the artistic discourse, as there is the creation of a new scientific object, looking for approaches to its linguistic positioning, forms of putting forward the scientific result.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was carried out with financial support from the Russian Science Foundation within the framework of scientific project no. 23-28-01284 “Terms inside and outside special discourse: Mechanisms of transition”.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe World of Russian Word;Issue 3-
dc.subjectscientific discourseen_GB
dc.subjectlanguage of scienceen_GB
dc.subjectartificial intelligenceen_GB
dc.subjectlinguocreativityen_GB
dc.subjectdiscourse analysisen_GB
dc.titleScientific Discourse with the Key Term Artificial Intelligenceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 3

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
11+Сложеникина+Козловская+Мусаева.pdf1,54 MBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.