Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33622
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorIgnatjeva, Olga A.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-17T13:26:31Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-17T13:26:31Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-
dc.identifier.citationIgnatjeva O. A. Discourse analysis of political judgments in the context of digitalization. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 2021, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 259–272.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2021.303-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/33622-
dc.description.abstractDiscourse analysis of texts and speeches has been one of the most popular research methods since the second half of the 20th century. Its emergence is associated with the works of postmodernists, such as G. Deleuze, J. Derrida, M. Foucault, E. Laclau, and Ch. Mouffe. The method is interesting because it allows us to take into account the context of expressed judgments and to uncover the implied meaning of statements. Despite the widespread use of this method, no unified methodology has been created. In foreign and Russian science, parallel trends and schools in the field of discourse analysis were formed, the most influential of which is discussed in this article. The emergence of social networks, digital platforms and applications has set a new trend in modifying and creating new variants of discourse analysis of texts and judgments, but already in a digital environment. Some of them, such as Y. G. Misnikov’s approach, can serve as an alternative to studying public opinion by means of a social survey. The purpose of this article is to analyze and systematize both traditional methods of discourse analysis of political judgments and new approaches using social networks, apps, websites, and digital platforms. In the course of the research, the methods of classification and systematization as well as, general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis were used. In the context of digitalization, five varieties of discourse analysis method were considered for text analysis in a digital environment: critical discourse analysis, corpus discourse analysis, mediated discourse analysis, multimodal discourse analysis, and discourse analysis using artificial intelligence. A thorough analysis of these methods allowed us to identify a gap in the analysis of political judgments on digital platforms of interaction between the government and the population, and to propose a variant of filling it on the basis of A. Kruglanski’s parametric model.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported with a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant no. 20-011-31361 “Outsourcing of Political Judgment: A Critical Analysis of the Information Paradigm of Network Public Communication”).en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPolitical Expertise: POLITEX;Volume 17; Issue 3-
dc.subjectdiscourse analysisen_GB
dc.subjectcritical discourse analysisen_GB
dc.subjectsocial mediaen_GB
dc.subjectmobile applicationsen_GB
dc.subjectneural networksen_GB
dc.subjectpolitical judgmentsen_GB
dc.titleDiscourse analysis of political judgments in the context of digitalizationen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 3

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
259-272.pdf680,19 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.