Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17246
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorYevsieiev, Оleksandr P.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-20T09:35:30Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-20T09:35:30Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.citationYevsieiev, Оleksandr P. 2020. “Political justice: Essence, genesis, and evolution”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 239–259.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.117-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/17246-
dc.description.abstractThe article deals with the phenomenon of the dependence of the judicial branch from the political authorities, known as “political justice”. Various forms of manifestation of this phenomenon in numerous types of legal proceedings (international, constitutional and criminal) are investigated. In addition to the politicization of justice, the opposite phenomenon is also observed — the judicialization of politics, which means more active listening by politicians to the position of the judiciary and more frequent appeals by politicians to legal means in order to achieve political goals. Indicators of judicial statistics are analyzed, indicative of the presence of an accusatory bias as a sign of politicization of the judiciary sui generis. Referring to specific trials (in particular, on former heads of state, political opponents of the ruling elite and Islamic extremists), different kinds of procedural tricks are used, which the judges resort to in resolving this category of cases. Positive and negative aspects of the interaction of courts with the legislative and executive branches of state power are highlighted. Psychological phenomena in the behavior and consciousness of judges that accompany “political justice”, in particular the so-called “strategic flight phenomenon”, can be analyzed where judges refrain from making decisions on high-profile cases, artificially delaying their consideration. The prevalence of a situation in which two parallel systems coexist peacefully in the structure of the judiciary is ascertained: ordinary courts and various kinds of emergency tribunals and other structures involved in political repressions. Reference is made to the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, in which the latter stated the political motivation of a number of criminal cases previously resolved by the national courts. In particular, a characteristic trick that lawyers resort to under conditions of political justice is to give retroactive force to the law.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 11; Issue 1-
dc.subject“political justice”en_GB
dc.subjectconstitutional justiceen_GB
dc.subjectpolitical repressionen_GB
dc.subjectaccusatory biasen_GB
dc.subjectprosecution of heads of stateen_GB
dc.subjectinternational criminal justiceen_GB
dc.titlePolitical justice: Essence, genesis, and evolutionen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 1

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
239-259.pdf689,59 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.