Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17148
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorNaumov, Victor B.-
dc.contributor.authorTytiuk, Ekaterina V.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-04T13:22:15Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-04T13:22:15Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09-
dc.identifier.citationNaumov, Victor B., Tytiuk, Ekaterina V. 2018. On the legal status of the “art” of the artificial intelligence. Pravovedenie 62 (3): 531–540.en_GB
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.307-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11701/17148-
dc.description.abstractThe article is dedicated to the issues of protection of artworks, created by the artificial intelligence or with the help of artificial intelligence. The authors of the article analyze the term “artificial intelligence” from the perspective of technologies, legal doctrine and legislation and provide critical comparison of these definitions, basing on which stipulate several key criteria of the definition of artificial intelligence. The article also describe basic principles of the working process of the artificial intelligence systems. Basing on the key criteria, provided as a result of the analysis of the existing definitions of the “artificial intelligence”, the authors generate their own definition of this term. The article also provides detailed analysis of the term “creativity” from the perspective of the objective and subjective approaches. The analysis includes comparison of the process of the creation of the work of art by the human and by the artificial intelligence. The authors question whether it is possible in principle to apply the term “work of art” to the objects created by the artificial intelligence. According to the authors’ point of view, current level of the artificial intelligence technologies does not provide any possibility to apply the term “creativity” to artificial intelligence as the model of the working process of the artificial intelligence is based ultimately on the mathematical algorithms. According to the article, this mean that the objects created by the artificial intelligence or with the help of it do not meet traditional requirements of creativity. The article provide several potential regulation models for the objects created by the artificial intelligence or with the help of it. These models can be broken down as follows: no legal protection is required, public domain model, protection under information law, protection as know-how objects, protection as intellectual property objects. The authors of the article provide comparative analysis of the above-mentioned models of protection, the advantages and disadvantages of each model, give their opinion on the existing and potential legislative initiatives in the sphere of artificial intelligence regulation.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research was performed with financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research as a part of the scientific research No. 18-29-16015 “Сomprehensive research of the legal and ethical aspects, connected with development and appliance of the artificial intelligence and robotics systems”.en_GB
dc.language.isoruen_GB
dc.publisherSt Petersburg State Universityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPravovedenie;Volume 62; Issue 3-
dc.subjectartificial intelligenceen_GB
dc.subjectcopyrighten_GB
dc.subjectexclusive rightsen_GB
dc.subjectcyber physical systemen_GB
dc.subjectlawen_GB
dc.subjectcreative worken_GB
dc.subjectknow-howen_GB
dc.subjectdraft lawen_GB
dc.subjectcaselawen_GB
dc.subjectinformationen_GB
dc.titleOn the legal status of the “art” of the artificial intelligenceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Располагается в коллекциях:Issue 3

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
531-540.pdf612,95 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.