Noted work' advantages: The relevance of the research's subject doesn't cause the objections. It should be noted that the texts of the certain chapters are logically connected among themselves, the set of the used works has allowed the author to give a complete picture of the current situation of tourism in Abkhazia. As the merit of the author we will note that within this subject the analysis of capacity of the West and East Abkhazia is the most productive.   Noted work's disadvantages: The map-scheme "The main natural and historical and cultural objects of the West and East Abkhazia" made by the author, from the our point of view is insufficiently informative as symbols aren't supported by the neccesary comment. On the page 31 the author gives an example of the ethnografic and ethnic tours. The first is regarded as the viable project. The realization of the second is connected with the unwillingness of the local population to "sell the hospitality". The criteria of division of the ethnografic and ethnic in the situation, where in the first and in the second case it is about acquaintance to the traditional culture of a feast in the local environment. In the category of the insignificant mistakes it should be noted that such artistry as weawing is considered by the author in the section "spiritual culture"; it is not clear in what vollume the objects exibited at the museum of the settlement Lzdaa are related to the ethnografy of the Abkhazians, because the author says that "things were gathered across the whole former USSR".  The conclusion:The Diploma written by Yulia Pritulyuk deserves an assessment "good" and its author the bachelor's degree.