Feedback on the final qualifying work on the topic
"Managing Relations with the State as a Stakeholder in the Corporate Governance System of Russian Business"
Raldugina Nadezhda Sergeevna,
studying under the main educational program of the bachelor's degree
"Economics" in the direction "Economics"

1. Evaluation of the quality of work:

Evaluation criteria (tested competencies) / Points: from 0 to 10 / Comments on the assessment (mandatory for those criteria for which there are comments)

1. Relevance of the theme of WRC 10
2 Correspondence of the content of the work with the stated topic and purpose of the study and the content of the findings 10
3 Clarity of setting goals and objectives of the study 10
4 Validity of the structure and logic of the study 10
5 Scientific and practical significance of the conclusions 10
6 The quality of the argumentation of the provisions of the work, including the use of statistical and calculation material 10
7 Relevance of information sources used 10
8 Compliance with the requirements for registration of WRC 10
9 Compliance with WRC 10 schedule
10 Completeness of the implementation of the recommendations of the supervisor 10
Total points: 100

Sum of points / Score / ECTS score
90 - 100 excellent A
80 - 89 good B
70 - 79 good C
61 - 69 satisfactory D
50 - 60 satisfactory E
Less than 50 unsatisfactory F

2. The presence of the author’s contribution to the results of the study, taking into account the results of the WRC check for the presence / absence of illegal borrowings: a report on identified text matches conducted in the Rukontext anti-plagiarism system and a meaningful examination of text matches allow us to conclude that there are no illegal borrowings:

Original fragments: 86.95%
Citations: 9.33%
Detected borrowings: 3.72%

3. Conclusion on the compliance of the purpose, objectives and results of the study with the requirements of the educational standard of St Petersburg University and the educational program in terms of mastering the established competencies: complies.

4. Conclusion/recommendations to the SEC members:

The topic of the WRC is relevant. The stated topic is disclosed and corresponds to the content of the work. The purpose and objectives of the study are formulated correctly. The logic of the study and the structure of the work are justified. It should be noted the scientific and practical significance of the findings, as well as the quality of the argumentation of the provisions of the work. The sources used in writing the WRC are relevant. The text of the WRC complies with the requirements for the design of the WRC. The WRC schedule was fully respected. The recommendations of the supervisor were taken into account and implemented in full.

5. Evaluation of the final qualifying work:

Excellent (A)


Scientific director
PhD in Economics,
Associate Professor, Department of Management and
planning of socio-economic processes
K.Yu. Belousov
05/17/2023