Final qualifying work of Alexandra P. Ivanova is a study of the multifaceted and culturally significant cultural phenomenon, as it's quite clear from its title: "A Futurism Architecture in the Culture of Italy." His theme, and its solution as well, fully meets the requirements for the respective compositions. As the author says in the introduction to the work, "the scene of a modern city, with all the internal voltages for the Futurists was ... force field on which are drawn all the dynamic rhythms of the future ...," ie, double meaning of the title of the work is also justified: this is actually a branch of Futurist artistic culture of the 20th century by the example of Italy, and plans for the future, that the future architecture of trying to resolve the teleological. That is the profile of the reviewed studies, based on the "source criticism" architectural futurism. The Q-factor design turns and its negative side - the text is hard to read, sometimes it can be to paragraphs in the same paragraph; Plus, lack of clear structure and formatting of the text body "loads" the reader's attention to the redundancy of parts and minor facts in an attempt to trace the author's desire to distinguish between "beginning and end" movement as a whole, as well as the place of some of its representatives in the latter. You seem to read a page from Wikipedia, which does not in itself reprehensible, but sometimes leads to the side of the abstract nature of the transfers and presentation. But, speaking about the positive aspects of the work, it should still be said about the large number of critical databases, most of which - had not previously been translated into the Russian language, it is not clear on what it is reasonable, and its introduction to the academic community should be welcomed. The work is centered around career A. Sant-Elia, who in the history of Italian Futurism appeared as someone akin to A. Rodin in the history of Impressionism in France, that is considered almost the main and only worth mentioning, and as the main "Futurism architect". Rehabilitation of other names - "personalities" - Ivanov also pays the appropriate place - paragraphs, etc. - In their work, that from the standpoint of the history of art (including the architecture of his kind) certainly belongs to the merits of her writings. Synthesis of Arts, refracted in the cult of science and technology was originally implemented not in some writings, manifestos of Italian contemporary architects, but also in their projects (for buildings can be applied to the plans "for the future" and not say), and this is also reflected in the exhaust work of the author. It would not hurt, of course, an album or a list of illustrations that are advantageous to set off the theoretical and practical calculations and observations of the Italian architectural praxis, but to them, as well as to bring the work to the same style (without permanent italics and numerous notes) apparently It did not have the elementary time. "The image of the design" - the most important element in the legacy of Antonio Sant'Elia, and other masters of architecture parsed directions - requires reading and thinking and conjecturing on the part of the reader, connect his imagination , based not on a video, but - solely on verbal ekphrasis (i.e. image words, monuments of fine art, such as had been practiced in the ancient rhetorical tradition). Summing up his impressions of the work, one can make a certain decision that the latter Ivanova A.P., in general, took place - and therefore deserves at least "good" marks for their possible available intelligent and literacy, as well as for "non-triviality" of selected topics for study within the bachelor of education. And should the researcher wish to continue to stay interested in it, so that was a continuation of the written dedication question or an urgent problem, as we see in this text.